So, you're curious about the ancestor. The fossil. The one that started the madness. It's a question that pops up more than you’d think: can I use GPT-1? Usually, it comes from a place of pure nostalgia or perhaps a developer trying to benchmark how far we’ve actually come since 2018.
Here is the short, honest answer: Yes, you can. But it’s probably not what you’re expecting.
You can't just head over to ChatGPT and find a "Legacy Mode" dropdown that toggles back to the original Generative Pre-trained Transformer. That would be like trying to find a floppy disk drive on a brand new MacBook Pro. OpenAI has moved on. The industry has moved on. But because OpenAI released the underlying code and the research was public, the "bits" of GPT-1 are still floating around the internet for anyone brave enough to mess with outdated Python libraries.
What it actually looks like to use GPT-1 right now
Forget the slick UI. Forget the helpful personality. GPT-1 was a proof of concept. When you ask, can I use GPT-1, you’re asking if you can run a model with roughly 117 million parameters. To put that in perspective, GPT-3 has 175 billion. GPT-4 is estimated to be in the trillions. GPT-1 is a toy in comparison.
If you want to touch it today, your best bet is Hugging Face.
Hugging Face is basically the GitHub of AI models. They host the weights for the original OpenAI GPT. If you have a bit of coding knowledge—specifically Python and the transformers library—you can pull the model down and run it on your own machine. You don't even need a beefy GPU. My old laptop could probably handle GPT-1 without breaking a sweat because it's so small by modern standards.
But here is the catch. GPT-1 doesn't "chat."
Back in 2018, the breakthrough wasn't a chatbot. It was "Generative Pre-training." The model was designed to predict the next word in a sequence. If you give it a prompt like "The cat sat on the," it might say "mat." If you ask it a complex question about quantum physics, it will likely descend into a word-salad nightmare or start repeating itself until it hits a token limit. It’s a raw engine without the steering wheel of "Instruction Tuning" or "RLHF" (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) that makes modern AI feel human.
The technical hurdles you'll hit
It's not just a "click and play" situation. To get GPT-1 running via Hugging Face, you’ll need to install the transformers library. You’ll use the OpenAIGPTLMHeadModel class.
Actually, using it reveals a lot about the history of the field. You'll notice the tokenizer is different. It uses Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), which was a big deal at the time but has been refined immensely since. You'll also notice the training data. GPT-1 was trained on the BookCorpus dataset—about 7,000 unpublished books. That’s it. It hasn't "read" the internet in the way GPT-4 has. It doesn't know about COVID-19. It doesn't know who won the last three elections. It is a time capsule of 2018 fiction writing.
Why would anyone actually want to use it?
Honestly? Mostly for research. Or if you’re a student trying to understand the architecture of a Transformer without the overhead of a massive model.
Alec Radford and the team at OpenAI published the original paper, "Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training," and it changed everything. Before this, we were using LSTMs (Long Short-Term Memory) and RNNs (Recurrent Neural Networks). Those were slow. They forgot the beginning of a sentence by the time they reached the end. GPT-1 proved that if you just stack enough Transformer blocks and feed them enough text, the model starts to "understand" grammar and logic on its own.
- Benchmarking: Seeing how much "intelligence" is added per billion parameters.
- Edge Computing: GPT-1 is tiny. It can run on a phone natively without an internet connection.
- Artistic Curiosity: Some writers like the "hallucinatory" and weirdly poetic failures of smaller models.
If you’re looking for a productivity tool, stop. Using GPT-1 for work is like using a stone sharpened into a knife to perform surgery. It’s technically a tool, but you’re going to have a bad time.
The "Can I Use GPT-1" misconception: It's not a website
One of the funniest things about the current AI boom is that people think "GPT" is a website. It's not. It's an architecture.
When people ask, "Can I use GPT-1?", they are often looking for a free version of ChatGPT. They think GPT-1 is just the "free, old version." That’s a total misunderstanding of how the technology evolved. GPT-1 was never a consumer product. It was a research milestone.
OpenAI didn't even release a web interface for GPT-2 at first because they were "worried about malicious use." It wasn't until GPT-3 and the subsequent "Instruct" versions that we got anything resembling a usable chat interface. So, if you're looking for a website where you can type "Write me an email to my boss" and get a coherent response from GPT-1, you're out of luck. It will probably write a paragraph about a fictional boss in a romance novel because that’s what it learned from its training books.
Finding a middle ground with GPT-2
If GPT-1 is too primitive but you still want that "vintage" AI feel, GPT-2 is much easier to find. There are dozens of web-based demos for GPT-2. It’s more coherent, has 1.5 billion parameters, and was trained on Reddit links (WebText). It's still significantly dumber than what we use now, but it can at least hold a sentence together for a paragraph or two.
But GPT-1? That's for the purists. The digital archeologists.
How to get started (The DIY path)
If you're still determined to try it, here is the roadmap. You won't find this on a "Top 10 AI Tools" list because it's too technical for the average user.
First, install Python. Then, run pip install transformers torch.
From there, you can write a short script to load openai-gpt. Here is the weird thing: OpenAI GPT-1 uses a specific way of handling special tokens that is slightly different from GPT-2 and 3. You have to be careful with how you format the input strings.
When you finally get it to spit out text, it’s a trip. It feels like talking to a ghost that only knows how to describe scenery in a generic fantasy novel. It’s fascinating and useless all at once.
Realities and limitations
We have to talk about the "safety" of these old models. Modern AI is heavily gated. There are layers of safety filters, RLHF, and system prompts that prevent the model from saying anything too crazy or dangerous.
GPT-1 has none of that.
It is "raw." While its low intelligence makes it less "dangerous" in terms of building a bomb or something, it can be incredibly biased or generate nonsensical, offensive text without any prompting. It doesn't have a moral compass because OpenAI hadn't invented the compass yet.
The hardware side
You don't need a $10,000 H100 GPU. You can run GPT-1 on a Raspberry Pi. This is actually a fun weekend project for hobbyists. Seeing a small piece of hardware generate text—even bad text—using the same basic architecture that powers the world's most advanced AI is pretty cool.
The takeaway for the curious
If you came here asking can I use GPT-1 because you wanted a free AI assistant, your journey ends in disappointment. You’re better off using the free tier of GPT-4o or even a small local model like Llama 3 or Mistral. Those models are lightyears ahead of GPT-1 in every conceivable metric.
However, if you are a coder, a historian of tech, or just someone who wants to see the "DNA" of the modern world, GPT-1 is a fascinating relic. It's the "Model T" of the AI world. It's loud, it's clunky, it's hard to start, and it doesn't have air conditioning, but it’s the reason we have Ferraris today.
Actionable next steps for the brave
If you're ready to actually try it, don't look for a login page.
- Go to Hugging Face. Search for "openai-gpt" (that's the specific handle for GPT-1).
- Use the "Inference API" on the model page if you don't want to code. It lets you type a prompt directly into a box on the website to see what the model generates.
- Compare the output. Take the same prompt and put it into ChatGPT. You will immediately understand why the world changed between 2018 and now.
- Read the paper. If you're serious about AI, read "Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training" by Radford et al. It’s surprisingly readable for a seminal academic paper.
Running GPT-1 isn't about utility. It's about perspective. It’s a reminder that this "overnight success" of AI took years of scaling, refining, and massive amounts of data to get right. It didn't start with a bang; it started with 117 million parameters and a few thousand unpublished books.
👉 See also: How to Connect New AirPods to iPad: What Most People Get Wrong
Now, go see for yourself how far we've come.