September was a wild month for anyone following the Linux kernel. Honestly, if you’re still thinking of eBPF as just a fancy way to do networking, you’ve basically missed the boat. The "September surge" in the ecosystem wasn't just about incremental updates; it was about eBPF finally maturing into a full-blown OS-level application platform.
Between the eBPF Vienna 2025 conference and the SIGCOMM workshop in Coimbra, the community essentially spent thirty days proving that the "kernel as a microservice" dream is actually happening. It’s kinda crazy how fast things are moving.
The Verifier is Getting a Massive Brain Upgrade
Let’s talk about the verifier. It’s the gatekeeper everyone loves to hate. If you’ve ever spent four hours fighting with "infinite loop" errors that weren't actually infinite, you know the pain.
During the mid-September sessions, a huge focus was placed on ePass. This is a new framework designed to make the verifier less of a rigid schoolmaster and more of a helpful partner. The goal? Enhancing runtime safety without the verifier being so restrictive that you can't actually build anything complex.
We also saw the introduction of load-acquire and store-release instructions. This sounds like boring low-level jargon, but it’s huge for anyone running eBPF on arm64 (which, let's face it, is almost everyone in the cloud now). It provides much finer control over memory ordering. Basically, it means your eBPF programs won't randomly flake out when running on graviton instances or modern M-series chips because of memory consistency issues.
The Rise of Signed BPF Programs
Security was the "secret" theme of the month. One of the biggest pieces of eBPF news September 2025 brought us was the nearly finished implementation of BPF signing.
👉 See also: Where is the neutron located in the atom? The simple answer is actually pretty weird
For a long time, if you could get root, you could load whatever BPF program you wanted. Security teams hated that. Now, with the work discussed at the Linux Plumbers eBPF track, we’re seeing a future where:
- Applications like Cilium can generate programs at runtime that are still cryptographically verified.
- Debugging tools can be locked down so they don't become backdoors.
- Managed environments can strictly enforce that only "known good" eBPF bytecode ever touches the kernel.
Scheduling is the New Frontier
If you haven't heard of sched_ext, you’re about to. It was the talk of the month.
People are starting to realize that the default Linux scheduler isn't always great for modern, weird workloads—especially AI training. In September, we saw several projects (many of which later dominated the eBPF Summit Hackathon) using eBPF to write custom schedulers.
Imagine being able to prioritize a specific container’s CPU cycles based on custom business logic without having to recompile your kernel and reboot the whole server. It’s powerful. It’s also a bit terrifying if you don’t know what you’re doing, but that’s the eBPF way.
💡 You might also like: Transcending the Future with Space Time Magic 36: Why Physics and Philosophy are Colliding
Microsoft and the "Corporate Kernel"
Interestingly, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux had a major release in late September (Build 101.25082.0003). Why does this matter? Because they’ve officially moved to an eBPF-first architecture for their Linux agents.
They’re ditching auditd for eBPF-based telemetry. This is a massive endorsement. When one of the biggest security vendors on the planet decides that eBPF is the only way to get "enhanced engine resiliency" and "automatic error recovery" on RHEL 10, the "is eBPF safe for production?" debate is officially over.
Real-World Bottlenecks: The FQDN Problem
We also saw a lot of movement regarding DNS-based network policies. Historically, tools like Cilium had to use a user-space proxy to intercept DNS queries to figure out which IP belongs to which domain name. It was slow. It was clunky.
The September updates pushed more of this logic directly into the kernel using eBPF maps. By eliminating the "user-space hop," clusters are seeing significantly lower latency for egress traffic. If your app talks to a lot of external APIs, this is probably the most practical "win" from this month's news cycle.
What Most People Are Missing
Everyone focuses on the code, but the community shifts are just as important. The eBPF Foundation announced a series of research grants in mid-September specifically focused on energy efficiency.
They’re calling it "QoS-aware power management." Essentially, using eBPF to throttle hardware power usage based on real-time app demand. In an era where AI data centers are eating all the electricity, using the kernel to shave 5% off your power bill is actually a killer feature.
Practical Steps to Take Now
If you’re managing Linux infrastructure, don't just read the news—apply it.
- Audit your current loads: Use
bpftoolto see what’s actually running in your kernel right now. You’d be surprised. - Move to BTF-enabled kernels: If you aren't on a kernel that supports BPF CO-RE (Compile Once – Run Everywhere), you're making your life 10x harder. Most modern distros (Ubuntu 24.04+, RHEL 9+) are fine, but double-check your old LTS boxes.
- Explore Sched_ext: If you have specific latency-sensitive workloads, start experimenting with custom schedulers in a lab environment. The days of "one size fits all" scheduling are ending.
- Update your security baseline: Check out the eBPF Foundation’s new threat model docs released this month. If you aren't using token-based verifier access, you're leaving the front door unlocked.
The era of eBPF being an "experimental" tool for Netflix and Meta engineers is long gone. September 2025 proved that it's now the standard plumbing for the modern cloud. If you aren't learning how to navigate this stack, you’re basically trying to be a plumber who doesn't understand how PVC works. It’s time to get your hands dirty with the bytecode.