Elon Musk is worried. Really worried. And it isn't about a rocket blowing up or a self-driving car hitting a curb. No, he's convinced that humanity is basically on a slow-motion crash course with extinction because we've stopped having enough babies.
It sounds like a plot from a sci-fi movie, right? But for the guy who wants to put a city on Mars, this is the biggest threat to civilization—bigger than global warming, bigger than AI going rogue, and definitely bigger than whatever is happening on your social media feed today.
Most people look at the world and see 8 billion humans. They see crowded subways and skyrocketing rent and think, "Yeah, we definitely have too many people." Musk thinks that’s a total myth. He’s been shouting from the digital rooftops that elon musk global population concerns aren't just a quirk of his; they are a mathematical certainty if you look at the birth rates in places like South Korea, Japan, and Italy.
The Math of the "Collapse"
Musk’s argument is pretty simple, honestly. If the birth rate stays below the replacement level—which is roughly 2.1 children per woman—for long enough, the population doesn't just level off. It collapses.
Take South Korea. Their fertility rate recently hit a staggering 0.72. That is way below what you need to keep a country going. Musk recently pointed out that at this rate, the South Korean population would shrink to a tiny fraction of its current size in just a few generations. He basically said that if this keeps up, North Korea wouldn't even need to invade; they could just "walk in" because there wouldn't be anyone left to defend the place. It’s a bit dramatic, sure, but the math is kinda terrifying when you think about it.
It's not just East Asia.
Poland is looking at a rate of around 1.1. Italy is down in the gutter too. Even the US is sitting at roughly 1.6, well below that "magic" 2.1 number. Musk looks at these numbers and sees a civilization that is "dying in adult diapers" rather than going out with a bang.
Why Musk Thinks We're Wrong About Overpopulation
For decades, we’ve been told the Earth is overpopulated. Paul Ehrlich’s The Population Bomb in the 60s started this whole panic that we’d run out of food and starve by the 80s. Obviously, that didn't happen.
Musk believes we fell for a false narrative. He thinks the planet can actually support way more people than we have now—maybe even double or triple. He often talks about how "consciousness" is a rare and precious thing in the universe. To him, more people means more collective consciousness, more ideas, and a better chance of solving the hard problems.
📖 Related: Starship Nothing Going to Stop Us: Why Musk's Giant Rocket is Actually Happening
If the population shrinks, the average age goes up. When you have a society where most people are retirees and very few are young workers, innovation stalls. Who is going to invent the next fusion reactor or starship if everyone is busy taking care of their 90-year-old parents?
What the Critics Say
Now, not everyone is buying what Musk is selling. Not by a long shot.
Groups like Population Matters and various UN demographers have pushed back hard. They point out that the global population is still growing by about 70 to 80 million people every year. The United Nations projects we’ll hit about 10.3 or 10.4 billion people by the 2080s before things start to plateau.
Experts like Olivia Nater from Population Connection argue that Musk is ignoring the environmental strain 8 billion people already put on the planet. We’ve already crossed several "planetary boundaries" regarding biodiversity and climate. From their perspective, a smaller, more sustainable population is actually a good thing. They see the "collapse" as a natural rebalancing after the massive explosion of the 20th century.
The Wealth Trap
There’s also this weird paradox Musk talks about: the richer a country gets, the fewer kids people have.
He’s blamed "hedonism" and "envy" in some of his posts on X. He basically thinks people get too comfortable and would rather buy a nice car or travel than do the hard work of raising a family. But if you talk to actual young people in 2026, they’ll tell you it’s more about the money.
Rent is insane. Childcare costs as much as a mortgage in some cities. Job security feels like a thing of the past. It’s hard to blame people for not having three kids when they can barely afford a one-bedroom apartment. Musk, being a billionaire with 14 kids, doesn't really have to worry about the cost of diapers, which makes his "just have more kids" advice feel a bit out of touch to some.
📖 Related: Why Your Milwaukee M12 Battery Case Is Probably Breaking and How to Fix It
Is AI the Solution or the Problem?
Interestingly, Musk thinks AI might be the only way to keep things running while the population declines. If there aren't enough young humans to work in factories or hospitals, we’re going to need robots to do it.
But he also worries that AI could make the problem worse. If people can find companionship with AI or if they feel like robots have replaced the need for human labor, the incentive to build a family might drop even further. It’s a bit of a double-edged sword.
What This Means for You
Whether you agree with him or not, elon musk global population concerns are forcing a conversation that most politicians have been ignoring for years. Demographic shifts move slowly, then all at once. By the time a country realizes it's in a death spiral, it might be too late to fix it.
So, what should you actually take away from this?
- Watch the birth rates: Don't just look at the total number of people. Look at the "fertility rate" in your own country. If it's under 2.0, you can expect some major economic shifts in the next 20 years.
- Economic planning: Aging populations mean different things for the stock market and social security. Labor shortages might drive up wages, but they could also drive up the cost of services like healthcare.
- The Family Policy Debate: Expect to see more "pro-natalist" policies. Governments are starting to realize that "tax breaks for kids" isn't enough; they might need to get way more aggressive with housing and childcare support if they want to avoid the "Japan scenario."
- Personal Perspective: Decisions about having children are deeply personal. Musk sees it as a duty to civilization, but for most people, it's about whether they can provide a good life for a child. Balancing those two perspectives is going to be the big cultural fight of the next decade.
The reality is probably somewhere in the middle. We aren't going to go extinct tomorrow, but the world is definitely getting older, and the "infinite growth" model our economies are built on is about to hit a very hard wall.