Waking up and opening the NYT Games app has basically become a secular ritual for millions of us. You grab your coffee, finish the Wordle in four tries, and then you see it. The grid. Sixteen words staring back at you with a smug kind of silence. Connections is the daily puzzle that feels personal. When you find the Connections NY Times answers early, you feel like a literal genius. When you fail? Honestly, it ruins the vibe of the whole morning.
Wyna Liu, the associate puzzle editor at the New York Times, is the mastermind behind these groupings, and she is remarkably good at her job. She knows how you think. She knows you'll see "Apple," "Orange," and "Banana" and immediately click them, only to realize later that "Apple" was actually part of a group about tech companies and "Orange" was a city in New Jersey. It’s a game of misdirection. It’s about fighting your own brain’s desire to find the easiest path.
Why Is Everyone Obsessed With Today's Connections?
The game launched in mid-2023, following the massive success of Wordle, but it taps into a different part of the brain. While Wordle is about linguistic probability and letter patterns, Connections is about semantic fluidity. It’s about how many "hats" a word can wear. A "Lead" can be a heavy metal, a starring role in a play, or a clue in a mystery.
✨ Don't miss: Why New York Times Games Connections Is Actually Getting Harder
The struggle to find the Connections NY Times answers usually boils down to what enthusiasts call "red herrings." The Times intentionally plants words that seem to belong together but don't. For instance, you might see four words that all relate to "Money," like "Buck," "Grand," "Bill," and "Green." You submit. Incorrect. Why? Because "Buck" was actually meant to be grouped with "Nanny" and "Billy" in a category about goats. It’s devious. It's brilliant. It makes you want to throw your phone across the room, yet you come back every single day at midnight.
The Color-Coded Difficulty Curve
If you've played more than once, you know the colors matter.
- Yellow: This is the "straightforward" group. Usually, the connection is obvious once you see it.
- Green: A bit more abstract, but still based on clear definitions.
- Blue: Now we're getting into wordplay, specific trivia, or slightly obscure niches.
- Purple: The "internal groan" category. This is often where they use the "Words that start with..." or "Blank ____" structures.
People often try to find the Purple group last by default. It's a survival strategy. If you can solve the first three, the last four words just fall into place. But relying on that "solve by omission" tactic can be dangerous if you’ve already burned through three of your four allowed mistakes.
How to Get Better at Finding Connections NY Times Answers
Stop clicking immediately. That’s the first rule. Most players fail because they see a connection and react. You need to look at the grid for at least 60 seconds before your first move. Look for "overlapping" words. If you see five words that could fit a category, you know that category is a trap. You have to figure out which word belongs somewhere else.
The "Read Aloud" Strategy
Seriously, say the words out loud. Sometimes your eyes see "Contract" and think of a legal document, but your ears hear "Contract" and think about shrinking. Since many Connections NY Times answers rely on homonyms or words with multiple pronunciations, vocalizing them can break the mental block.
Think about the word "Wind." Is it the breeze? Or is it what you do to a watch? If you only see it as the breeze, you'll never connect it to "Coil" or "Twist."
Be Wary of the "Specific" Category
Sometimes the New York Times gets really niche. We’ve seen categories ranging from "Palindromes" to "Members of the Rat Pack" to "Units of Measurement that are also Names." If you aren't a trivia buff, the Blue and Purple rows can feel unfair. But usually, there is a linguistic link that doesn't require a PhD in 1950s pop culture.
📖 Related: Hidden Money on GTA 5 Online: The Stashes Rockstar Doesn't Explicitly Map Out
The game is designed to be solvable by a general audience, even if it feels like it was written specifically to annoy you.
The Social Media Phenomenon
Why do we share those little colored squares on X (formerly Twitter) and Threads? It's the "water cooler" effect. Before the internet, people did the crossword in the physical newspaper and talked about it at work. Now, we have a digital scoreboard. Seeing a friend get the Purple group first is genuinely intimidating.
There's a community aspect to hunting for the Connections NY Times answers. Websites like Mashable, Forbes, and even dedicated subreddits exist solely to provide hints. Some people want the full answer immediately because they just want to keep their streak alive. Others want "nudges"—small hints like "Look at the verbs" or "One category is about footwear."
Is it Cheating to Look Up Hints?
Kinda. But also, who cares? It’s a game. If looking up the Connections NY Times answers prevents you from being grumpy for the rest of your commute, do it. The goal is mental stimulation, not a standardized test. However, there is a specific pride in solving a "Tricky" rated puzzle without any help.
The NYT "Easy" puzzles usually have a high solve rate (above 80%), but the "Hard" ones can drop down to 40% or lower. When the success rate is that low, the collective frustration on social media is palpable. It becomes a shared trauma.
Common Pitfalls and Mental Traps
The biggest mistake is "tunnel vision." You get it in your head that "Bowl" must be related to "Plate" and "Spoon." You spend all your guesses trying to force that "Kitchenware" category to work. Meanwhile, "Bowl" was actually part of "Words that follow 'Super'" (Super Bowl, Super Glue, Super Man, Super Star).
You have to be willing to kill your darlings. If a group isn't working, abandon it completely and look at the words you haven't touched yet.
- The "Parts of a Word" Trap: Sometimes the connection isn't the word itself, but a prefix or suffix.
- The "Hidden Category" Trap: Four words might all be synonyms for "Fast," but one of them is also a type of "Fixed-wing aircraft."
- The "Compound Word" Trap: Words that don't seem related at all but all share a common first half (e.g., "Fire" for Fireman, Firecracker, Fireball, Firefly).
Practical Steps to Master the Grid
If you want to stop failing your daily puzzle, you need a system. Don't just wing it.
💡 You might also like: Why your cable for Nintendo Switch might actually be killing your battery
- Scan for Synonyms First: This is usually the Yellow or Green group. Find four words that mean almost exactly the same thing.
- Identify the "Oddballs": Look for words that are very specific. If "Q-Tip" is on the board, it likely isn't a synonym for anything. It’s part of a brand name group or a "Starts with a Letter" group.
- Shuffle the Board: Use the "Shuffle" button. It’s there for a reason. Our brains get stuck on the spatial arrangement of the words. Moving them around can break the false connections your eyes have created.
- The "Two-Group" Rule: Don't hit submit until you think you've found two separate groups. This confirms you aren't using a word that actually belongs in the other group.
- Check for "Types of": A very common NYT tactic. Four things that are all "Types of Ferns" or "Types of Pasta."
The Connections NY Times answers are rarely as simple as they look at first glance. It requires a mix of vocabulary, cultural knowledge, and lateral thinking. It’s about seeing the forest and the trees simultaneously.
Next time you open the app, remember that the puzzle is a conversation between you and the editor. She’s trying to trick you; your job is to show her you’re too smart for that. Take a breath, look for the overlaps, and don't let the Red Herrings win. If you get stuck, look for the most "boring" word on the board—it's usually the key to the hardest group.
Go back to the grid. Look at the four words you ignored. They probably have more in common than you think. Happy puzzling.