Honestly, if you've ever felt like the world is just a giant simulation or a series of glitches, you're basically living in a world Jorge Luis Borges built decades ago. It’s wild to think that a blind librarian from Buenos Aires predicted the internet, Wikipedia, and the multiverse before most of us were even born. But he did. And he did it through a specific collection of stories that changed everything.
Labyrinths by Jorge Luis Borges isn't just a book. It’s a cognitive trap.
When it first hit the English-speaking world in 1962, published by New Directions, it wasn't a standard novel. It was a "greatest hits" compilation of short stories, essays, and parables translated by James E. Irby and Donald A. Yates. Before this, Borges was a bit of a cult secret in Argentina. After this? He was the guy who shared the International Publishers' Prize with Samuel Beckett and suddenly everyone from Umberto Eco to William Gibson was obsessed with him.
The Library, the Spy, and the Infinite Choice
The weirdest thing about Borges is that he never wrote a long novel. He thought they were a waste of time. Why write 500 pages when you can summarize a fake 500-page book in ten?
Take "The Library of Babel." It’s one of the heavy hitters in the collection. Imagine a universe made entirely of hexagonal rooms. Each room has the same number of books. The books contain every possible combination of letters. This means every book ever written is in there—and every book that could be written. Your autobiography is there, but so is a version where you’re a professional unicyclist. Most of the library is just gibberish, and people go insane trying to find the one "Vindication" book that explains their life.
It's basically a metaphor for the internet, right? Infinite info, zero meaning.
Then you've got "The Garden of Forking Paths." On the surface, it’s a World War I spy thriller. Yu Tsun is a Chinese spy for Germany, running from a British officer named Richard Madden. But the story turns into a deep dive into time. He meets a man named Stephen Albert who has figured out that time isn't a straight line. It's a "labyrinth of symbols" where every time a man is faced with alternatives, he chooses all of them. He creates diverse futures, diverse times which themselves also proliferate and fork.
If that sounds like the Marvel Multiverse, that’s because it is. Borges was just sixty years ahead of the curve.
Why We Keep Getting Labyrinths by Jorge Luis Borges Wrong
People often call Borges a "magical realist," putting him in the same bucket as Gabriel García Márquez. But that’s kinda lazy.
🔗 Read more: Why Truth or Die 2012 Still Hits Different for British Horror Fans
Borges didn't care about the "real" part as much as he cared about the "idea" part. His stories are more like mathematical proofs or philosophical puzzles than traditional fiction. He was obsessed with the concept of the "Double"—the idea that you aren't really you, or that someone else is dreaming you.
In "The Circular Ruins," a man tries to dream a human being into existence. He succeeds, only to realize at the end, with a crushing sense of relief and horror, that he himself is being dreamed by someone else.
The Pierre Menard Paradox
There’s a story in the collection called "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote" that honestly breaks most people's brains the first time they read it.
It’s written as a dry literary review of a fictional French author who decides to write Don Quixote. Not a modern version. Not a translation. He wants to write the exact same words, letter for letter, as Cervantes.
Borges argues that Menard’s version is actually more impressive because he’s writing it as a 20th-century man. Even though the words are identical, the meaning is totally different because the context of history has changed. It's a massive middle finger to the idea of "originality" and a precursor to how we think about remixes and AI-generated content today.
👉 See also: Whitney Houston Hit Songs: What Most People Get Wrong
The Physicality of a Mental Maze
Borges didn't just use the word "labyrinth" because it sounded cool. He was fascinated by the idea of a space that is designed to confuse but has a center.
- The Literal Labyrinth: Physical mazes like the one in "The House of Asterion" (a retelling of the Minotaur myth from the monster's perspective).
- The Temporal Labyrinth: Time that loops or splits, as seen in "The Secret Miracle," where God stops time for a man facing a firing squad so he can finish his play in his head.
- The Intellectual Labyrinth: Books that contain themselves, or libraries that contain the universe.
The 1962 edition of Labyrinths was crucial because it pulled from several of his Spanish collections, mainly Ficciones and El Aleph. If you pick up a copy today, you’ll likely see the introduction by William Gibson. Gibson, the guy who coined the term "cyberspace," basically admits that Borges laid the groundwork for the digital age.
Reading Borges in 2026: Actionable Steps
If you’re looking to dive into Labyrinths by Jorge Luis Borges without getting hopelessly lost, don't try to read it cover-to-cover like a beach read. It’s too dense.
- Start with the "Big Three": Read "The Library of Babel," "The Garden of Forking Paths," and "The Circular Ruins" first. These give you the "Borgesian" DNA.
- Read the Essays: Most people skip the back half of the book, but the essays like "A New Refutation of Time" are where he explains the "why" behind the "what."
- Don't Look for "Character Arcs": Borges’ characters are often just vessels for ideas. If you’re looking for a deep emotional journey, you might be disappointed. Look for the "twist" in the logic instead.
- Compare Translations: If you find the Irby/Yates translation a bit stiff, look for the Andrew Hurley versions in Collected Fictions. They feel more modern, though some purists still swear by the 1962 Labyrinths for its vibe.
The ultimate takeaway from Borges is that the universe is a book we are all currently writing and reading at the same time. It’s messy, it’s infinite, and there is no exit. But the act of looking for the center? That’s what makes us human.
Go find a copy of the New Directions paperback. It’s usually got a weird, abstract cover that looks exactly like how the inside of your head will feel after you finish it.