Let's get the big thing out of the way first. There is no "dark side" of the moon. Honestly, Pink Floyd has a lot to answer for because that phrase has stuck in the public consciousness like superglue, even though it’s scientifically a bit of a mess. Every square inch of the lunar surface gets sunlight at some point. It has a day and a night, just like Earth, though a "day" there lasts about two weeks. What we are actually talking about are moon dark side photos of the far side—the part that perpetually faces away from our planet due to tidal locking.
For centuries, this was the ultimate blind spot. Humans looked up, saw the "Man in the Moon," and wondered what was on the flip side. Was it more of the same? Giant cities? Nothingness? We had zero clue until the Space Age kicked into gear. When the first grainy, noisy images finally beamed back, they didn't look anything like the moon we knew. It was a total shock to the system for astronomers.
The far side is rugged. It’s battered. It lacks those giant, dark "seas" of basaltic lava called maria that make the near side look so familiar. Instead, it’s a chaotic mess of craters piled on top of craters. It’s the solar system’s punching bag.
The 1959 breakthrough that changed everything
Imagine it’s October 1959. Cold War tension is everywhere. The Soviet Union launches Luna 3. This wasn't a sleek, modern 4K camera rig. It was basically a floating darkroom. The craft took photos on 35mm film, developed them automatically while orbiting the moon, and then scanned them with a light beam to transmit the data via radio waves. It was incredibly primitive by today's standards, but those first moon dark side photos were revolutionary.
They were blurry. They were full of static. But they proved that the far side was a completely different beast.
Only about 1% of the far side contains the dark maria we see from Earth. Why? That’s still a bit of a debate among geophysicists. One leading theory suggests that because the Earth was still glowing hot when the moon was forming, the side facing us stayed warmer longer. This meant the crust on the near side was thinner, allowing volcanic magma to seep out and create those flat dark plains. The far side, cooling faster, grew a thick, armor-like crust that kept the lava trapped inside.
Why NASA’s Apollo 8 mission felt different
When Jim Lovell, Bill Anders, and Frank Borman looped around the moon in 1968, they became the first humans to see the far side with their own eyes. They weren't just looking at moon dark side photos on a monitor; they were staring into the abyss.
Bill Anders famously described it as looking like a "dirty beach" or "whitish-grey sand." There's something haunting about that description. It lacks the romanticism of the "Man in the Moon." It’s just raw, pulverized rock. During their orbits, they were completely cut off from Earth. No radio. No mission control. Just three guys in a tin can looking at a landscape no human had ever witnessed.
The photos they brought back showed the sheer density of impact craters. Because the far side faces out toward the rest of the solar system, it’s effectively a shield for Earth. It takes the hits so we don't have to. Every crater you see in those high-resolution NASA shots represents a cosmic bullet that didn't hit our home planet.
Modern high-def views from LRO and Chang'e 4
Fast forward to the 2010s and 2020s. We aren't relying on grainy Soviet film anymore. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has been mapping the surface for years with terrifying precision. You can go online right now and zoom in on individual boulders on the far side.
💡 You might also like: How to Find MPC and Why Most People Get It Totally Wrong
Then came China.
In 2019, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) did something no one else had: they landed a rover on the far side. The Chang'e 4 mission, along with its Yutu-2 rover, gave us our first "ground-level" moon dark side photos. Because you can't send a radio signal through the moon, they had to park a relay satellite (Queqiao) in a specific orbit just to talk to the rover.
The images from Chang'e 4 are surreal. The dirt—or regolith—looks different. It’s a desaturared, brownish-grey world. It feels lonelier than the Apollo landing sites. The rover discovered that the lunar soil on the far side is surprisingly sticky, and the temperature swings are even more brutal than we expected.
The radio silence of the far side
There is one reason scientists are obsessed with the far side that has nothing to do with "cool pictures." It’s the quietest place in the neighborhood. Earth is incredibly noisy. We pump out radio waves, television signals, and cell phone chatter 24/7. This creates a "fog" that makes it hard for radio telescopes to hear the faint whispers of the early universe.
The far side is shielded by 2,000 miles of solid rock. It’s a natural "radio quiet zone."
If we ever want to see the "Dark Ages" of the universe—the time before the first stars turned on—we have to build a telescope there. That’s why these moon dark side photos are more than just eye candy. They are scouting reports. We are looking for flat craters where we can lay down wires and antennas to listen to the Big Bang’s echo without hearing a Top 40 radio station from New Jersey getting in the way.
Dissecting the conspiracy theories
You’ve seen the "leaked" photos. The ones with the alien bases, the giant towers, or the crashed spaceships. People love a good mystery. Honestly, the idea that there’s a secret base on the far side is way more fun than the reality of a bunch of grey rocks.
But here’s the problem with those "secret" moon dark side photos: physics doesn't keep secrets well.
We have high-resolution imagery from multiple countries now—the US, Russia, China, India, and Japan. If there was a glass dome or a neon-lit city back there, one of these competing agencies would have leaked it to embarrass the others. Instead, what we see is a graveyard of craters. The "towers" people point out are almost always long shadows cast by low-angle sunlight hitting a crater rim, or "pixel artifacts" from when digital images are compressed for the web.
The real mystery isn't aliens; it's the South Pole-Aitken Basin. This is one of the largest, deepest, and oldest impact craters in the solar system. It’s about 1,600 miles wide. That’s like a hole stretching from New York to Denver. The photos of this region show a weird chemical signature—lots of iron and thorium. Something massive hit the moon and turned it inside out right there.
How to find authentic imagery yourself
If you want to see the real deal, don't just look at Google Images. It's a minefield of CGI and "artist's impressions" that people pass off as real.
Go to the source.
The LRO Camera (LROC) website is an incredible rabbit hole. You can browse gigabytes of raw moon dark side photos. You can see the "Dark Side" in full color—which, funny enough, is actually just various shades of grey and tan. You can also check the CNSA archives for the Chang'e 4 and 5 data, though their websites can be a bit tricky to navigate.
- Check the lighting: Real lunar photos have harsh, directional lighting. There’s no atmosphere to scatter light, so shadows are pitch black.
- Look for "stitching": Many far-side maps are composites. You’ll see lines where different orbits were pasted together. This isn't a cover-up; it's just how you map a sphere.
- Verify the mission: If a photo claims to be from the far side but shows the Earth in the background, it’s a fake (unless it was taken from a satellite far behind the moon). From the surface of the far side, you can never, ever see Earth.
What’s next for lunar photography?
We are entering a new era. NASA’s Artemis program aims to put boots back on the moon, and eventually, that includes the far side. We aren't just going to have grainy photos; we're going to have 4K live streams.
Private companies like Intuitive Machines and Astrobotic are also aiming for lunar landings. We’re about to be flooded with more moon dark side photos than we know what to do with. This will hopefully kill off the "alien base" theories for good, but who knows? People are stubborn.
To truly understand the far side, you have to stop thinking of it as a place of darkness. Think of it as a time capsule. Because there is no wind, no rain, and no plate tectonics to erase the surface, the far side is a pristine record of the last 4 billion years of solar system history. Those craters are a diary.
Take action: Exploring the lunar surface from home
If you're genuinely interested in the geography of the far side, start with the Lunar QuickMap. It’s a tool used by actual planetary scientists that lets you toggle between different data layers—elevation, slope, and even rock abundance.
- Visit the LROC QuickMap.
- Change the projection to "Far Side."
- Enable the "Labels" layer to find landmarks like the Mare Moscoviense, one of the few dark spots on the back.
- Use the "3D" tool to fly through the craters and see why landing a craft there is such a nightmare for engineers.
The more you look at the real data, the more the "dark side" myth fades away, replaced by something much more interesting: a brutal, ancient, and beautifully complex world that’s been watching our backs for eons.