Google is a black box. Most people think a bunch of lines of code just decide what you see when you search for "best coffee maker" or "how to fix a leaky pipe." That’s mostly true. But there's this weird, human element that most folks ignore. It’s the Search Quality Evaluators. These are real people—thousands of them—who sit at computers and grade websites. They use a massive document called the Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines. Honestly, it’s a beast. Over 160 pages of dense, dry instructions on what makes a website "good" or "bad."
If you’re trying to rank a site, you’ve probably heard people screaming about E-E-A-T. It stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. It’s basically the North Star for Google right now. But here is the thing: the guidelines aren't just one big pile of rules. They’re structured. Specifically, the Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines fall into four main categories that help these human raters decide if your page deserves to be on page one or buried in the digital basement.
Understanding these categories isn't just for SEO nerds. It’s for anyone who wants to understand how the internet's gatekeeper thinks. If you get how these raters are trained, you start to see why some sites thrive while others just... disappear.
The Foundation: Page Quality Rating
This is the big one. It’s where the human raters spend most of their time. Google wants to know: what is the purpose of this page? If a page exists to help you buy a pair of shoes, does it actually do that? Or is it just a wall of ads with a tiny "buy" button hidden at the bottom?
Raters look at the "Main Content" (MC). This is the meat of the page. They’re told to ignore the headers, the footers, and those annoying "related articles" sidebars. They want to see if the person who wrote the content actually knows what they’re talking about. For example, if I’m writing about how to treat a burn, I better have some medical credentials or be citing a real doctor. Google calls this YMYL—Your Money or Your Life. If a page can affect your health, your finances, or your safety, the bar for quality is sky-high.
Experience is the newest kid on the block. It’s the extra "E" in E-E-A-T. Basically, Google wants to see that you’ve actually used the product you’re reviewing. If you’re writing a travel guide to Kyoto, did you actually go there? Or did you just rewrite a Wikipedia entry? Raters look for original photos, personal anecdotes, and specific details that only a human who was actually there would know. It’s getting harder to fake.
Understanding User Needs
People search for weird stuff. Sometimes they’re looking for a specific fact, like "how tall is the Eiffel Tower?" Other times, they’re just "browsing" or looking for a specific website. This second category of the guidelines focuses on "Needs Met."
🔗 Read more: How Old Are the World: The Real Number Might Surprise You
It’s a scale. On one end, you have "Fully Meets." This is the holy grail. It’s when a user searches for something and the result gives them exactly what they need immediately. Think of a weather forecast or a calculator. On the other end, you have "Fails to Meet." This happens when the result is off-topic, outdated, or just plain wrong.
The raters have to put themselves in the shoes of the searcher. They ask: "If I searched for this, would I be happy with this result?" It sounds simple. It’s not. Context matters. If you search for "Mercury," are you looking for the planet, the car brand, or the element? The guidelines teach raters how to navigate that ambiguity. They have to look at the "User Intent."
Most of the time, users have a "Do," "Know," "Go," or "Web-site" intent.
- Do: Buying a phone, downloading an app.
- Know: Fact-finding or research.
- Go: Navigational queries like "Facebook login."
- Web-site: Looking for a specific brand's home.
If your page doesn't align with what the user actually wants to do, you’re toast. You could have the most well-written article in the world about the history of hammers, but if the user wants to buy a hammer, your page isn't helpful.
Specific Rating Tasks and Scenarios
The third category is where things get a bit more technical. This covers how raters should handle specific types of content, like "Dictionary and Encyclopedia" results or "Illegal and Hateful" content.
Google is terrified of being a platform for harm. The guidelines are very, very clear about this. If a page promotes hate speech, violence, or harmful misinformation, the raters are told to give it the lowest rating possible. No exceptions. They also have specific rules for "Your Money or Your Life" (YMYL) topics. If you’re giving financial advice, you need to be an expert. You can't just be some guy in a basement talking about crypto—unless you can prove you actually have the background to back it up.
There’s also a big focus on "Reputation." Raters are told to go outside of the website they’re evaluating. They look at Yelp reviews, Better Business Bureau ratings, and news articles. If a site has a reputation for scamming people, it doesn't matter how pretty the design is. It’s going to get flagged.
Honestly, this is where a lot of small businesses struggle. They focus so much on their own site that they forget the rest of the internet is talking about them. Google listens to that chatter.
Use of the Rating Scale
The final category is basically the "how-to" for the raters. It explains the actual sliders and buttons they use in their software. They use a five-point scale for Needs Met and a similar scale for Page Quality.
It’s not just "good" or "bad." It’s "Medium," "High," and "Very High."
A "Very High" quality page is rare. It requires a high level of E-E-A-T, a very positive reputation, and content that is truly helpful and original.
Raters are also taught how to identify "Low Quality" signals. These include:
- An inadequate amount of Main Content.
- The author has no expertise in the topic.
- The title is exaggerated or "clickbaity."
- The site is difficult to navigate or full of "distracting" ads.
One thing that surprises people is that Google doesn't hate ads. They get it. Sites need to make money. But if the ads get in the way of the content, that’s a problem. If you have to scroll through three pop-ups just to read the first sentence, your Page Quality rating is going to tank.
📖 Related: Apple Unable to Activate: Why Your iPhone is Stuck and How to Fix It
Why Should You Care?
You might think, "I'm not a Google rater, so why does this matter?"
Because these guidelines are the blueprint for the algorithm. Google’s engineers use the feedback from these raters to tweak the code. If the raters say they hate a certain type of content, the engineers will eventually train the AI to demote that content automatically.
By following the logic that the Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines fall into four main categories, you can "future-proof" your website. You stop chasing the latest "hack" and start building something that actually provides value.
Think about it. If you focus on meeting user needs, proving your experience, and building a solid reputation, you’re doing exactly what Google wants. You're making the internet a better place. And Google loves that.
Moving Beyond the Basics
Most people stop at the acronyms. They think if they put an "About Us" page and a "Terms of Service" link, they’ve "done E-E-A-T." They haven't.
Real quality is about the details. It's about citing your sources. It’s about being honest when you don’t know something. It’s about making sure your site works perfectly on a cheap smartphone, not just a high-end Mac.
The guidelines also mention "Functional" parts of a page. Does the search bar work? Do the images load? If your site is broken, it doesn't matter how good the writing is. Raters are told to look at the "User Experience" (UX) as a whole.
Actionable Steps for Better Quality
If you want to align your site with these four categories, stop thinking like a marketer and start thinking like a rater.
- Audit your YMYL content. If you’re giving advice on health, money, or safety, make sure it’s backed by real evidence. Link to government sites, academic journals, or recognized experts.
- Prove your Experience. Don’t just write "The Best Laptops of 2026." Write "I spent 40 hours testing these 10 laptops in a coffee shop." Use your own photos. Talk about the things that annoyed you, not just the features.
- Check your Reputation. Google "your brand name + reviews." If the first page is full of complaints, fix the problems in your business before you try to fix your SEO.
- Prioritize the "Main Content." Look at your top-performing pages. Is the answer to the user's question buried under 500 words of "fluff"? Move the answer to the top. Make it easy for the user to get what they came for.
The internet is changing. AI-generated garbage is everywhere. In this environment, the human-centric rules in Google's guidelines are more important than ever. If you can prove you’re a real person providing real value to other real people, you’re already ahead of 90% of the competition.
💡 You might also like: I Want AI to Do My Laundry and Dishes: Why Are We Still Waiting?
It’s not about "tricking" the algorithm anymore. It’s about being the result that the human raters—and the users—actually want to find. Sorta simple when you think about it that way, right?
Focus on the four categories: Page Quality, Needs Met, Specific Scenarios, and the Rating Scale. Use them as a checklist for every piece of content you publish. When you align your goals with Google's goals, the rankings tend to take care of themselves.
Check your site's "About" page today. If it doesn't clearly explain why you are qualified to talk about your topic, rewrite it. That is the quickest way to start signaling E-E-A-T to both humans and the machines that watch them.