Look at Saturn. It’s the crown jewel of our solar system, right? Those rings are massive, spanning hundreds of thousands of kilometers, yet they’re thin as a pancake. We’re taught in school that they are just ice and rock—leftovers from a moon that got too close and ripped apart by gravity. But then you run into Norman Bergrun. He wasn’t some random guy with a telescope in a backyard. He was a mechanical engineer at NASA’s Ames Research Center. He worked on the Voyager missions. And in 1986, he published a book called The Ringmakers of Saturn that basically set the scientific community on fire, though mostly by making them ignore him.
Bergrun looked at the photos coming back from Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 and saw things that didn’t make sense to him. Not just dust. Not just ice. He saw what he called "Electromagnetic Vehicles" or EMVs. He argued these things were actually creating the rings.
It sounds like a sci-fi movie plot. Honestly, it kind of is. But when a guy who helped design the Lockheed Polaris missile starts pointing at cylinders the size of Earth in Saturn’s rings, people tend to either lean in or walk away very fast.
What Bergrun Actually Claimed He Saw
Bergrun’s whole premise relied on anomalies in the Voyager data. He focused on these elongated, cylindrical shapes that appeared to be interacting with the ring material. According to his analysis, these weren't just weird-shaped rocks. They were massive, self-luminous craft. He argued that these "ring makers of saturn" were exhausting material that actually formed the rings themselves. Basically, the rings aren't debris; they're exhaust or a byproduct of some gargantuan construction project.
He used photographs like the one of the F-ring. If you look at the F-ring, it has this weird, braided appearance. It’s chaotic. Standard physics explains this through "shepherd moons" like Prometheus and Pandora. Their gravity pulls and pushes the ring particles into those strange shapes. Bergrun didn't buy it. He thought the "braiding" looked like the wake of a ship.
Think about the scale here. We’re talking about objects that are, by his calculations, sometimes larger than the diameter of Earth. It’s hard to wrap your head around. If someone tells you there’s a van-sized satellite out there, sure. But a ship the size of a planet? That’s where he lost a lot of people.
📖 Related: Oura Ring Gen 3: What Most People Get Wrong After Six Months
The Voyager Photos and the Problem of "Artifacts"
The biggest hurdle for the ring makers of saturn theory is the technology of the 1980s. Voyager's cameras were incredible for their time, but they weren't the 8K ultra-high-def sensors we have today. When you take a digital image and blow it up 500%, you get pixels. You get "noise."
Most planetary scientists, like the late Carolyn Porco who led the Cassini imaging team, would tell you that Bergrun was seeing "imaging artifacts." These are glitches in the data transmission or the way the camera sensor handled light. If a bright pixel bleeds into the next one because of a long exposure, it looks like a line. To Bergrun, that line was a massive metallic cylinder. To a NASA tech, it was just a messy data packet.
Yet, Bergrun was stubborn. He pointed out that these "objects" appeared in different shots, from different angles, and at different times. He didn't think a glitch would be that consistent. He spent years analyzing the luminosity and the shadows. He was convinced these things were "parked" in the rings, drawing energy from the planet’s magnetic field.
Why the Theory Persists in 2026
You’d think with the Cassini mission ending in 2017, we would have settled this. Cassini spent 13 years orbiting Saturn. It dove through the rings. It took photos so clear you can see individual waves in the dust. And yet, the "ring makers of saturn" idea hasn't died. It’s actually grown in some corners of the internet.
Why? Because Cassini did find weird stuff. We found "propellers." These are small, propeller-shaped gaps in the rings caused by tiny moonlets. They aren't alien ships, but they are "makers" in a sense—they shape the rings.
✨ Don't miss: How to Make a Computer with Paper: The Low-Tech Truth About Logic Gates
There’s also the hexagonal storm on Saturn’s north pole. It’s a geometric perfect hexagon that’s wider than two Earths. Science says it’s a standing wave in the atmosphere. But for those who believe Bergrun was on to something, it looks like evidence of planetary-scale engineering. It’s that gap between "we think it’s a fluid dynamics phenomenon" and "we don’t know for 100% sure" where the alien theories live.
The Engineering Pedigree of Norman Bergrun
It’s easy to dismiss a "UFO guy." It’s harder to dismiss a guy with Bergrun’s resume.
- He was a member of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), which became NASA.
- He worked at Lockheed Missiles and Space Company.
- He held top-secret clearances.
When he talked about the ring makers of saturn, he wasn't talking about "little green men." He was talking about plasma physics and electromagnetic propulsion. He was looking at it as an engineer. He saw a structure—the rings—and he looked for the machine that built it.
The scientific community mostly responded with silence. Not because of a cover-up, usually, but because his conclusions required such a massive leap of faith that it broke the "Occam’s Razor" rule. The simplest explanation is usually ice. Bergrun’s explanation required an entirely unknown, hyper-advanced civilization hiding in plain sight.
Looking at the Evidence Critically
If you actually sit down with his book—which is quite rare and expensive now—you see hundreds of plates of Voyager images. Some are compelling. You see these bright streaks that don't quite align with the orbital motion of the rings. Some look like they have "exhaust plumes" coming out of the ends.
But here is the catch. Space is a very harsh environment for photography. High-energy particles hit the camera sensors all the time. This creates "bright spots" or streaks on the film. In the 80s, these images were transmitted via radio waves across billions of miles. A tiny bit of interference can create a line.
Also, Saturn’s rings are incredibly reflective. Water ice reflects sunlight like a mirror. When you have billions of ice chunks moving at thousands of miles per hour, you’re going to get some crazy light reflections. A "luminous craft" might just be a particularly reflective cluster of ice caught in a weird angle of sunlight.
The "Invisibility" Argument
One of the more out-there parts of the ring makers of saturn lore is the idea that these craft are "camouflaged." Bergrun suggested they might use the ring material itself to hide. By surrounding themselves with dust and ice, they become part of the ring.
This is a classic "unfalsifiable" argument. If you see something, it’s a ship. If you don’t see something, it’s a ship that’s hiding. That’s usually where mainstream science taps out. If you can't prove it wrong, it's not a scientific hypothesis; it’s a belief.
But, to be fair to the believers, Saturn’s rings are changing. We’ve seen "spokes"—dark streaks that appear and disappear across the rings. They were first seen by Voyager, then they vanished for years, then Cassini saw them again. NASA scientists believe these are clouds of tiny, charged dust particles levitating above the rings due to static electricity. Bergrun, of course, thought they were related to the activity of the EMVs.
Taking Action: How to Explore This Yourself
If you're fascinated by the idea of anomalies in space, don't just take a blog post's word for it. You can actually look at the data yourself.
- Access the NASA PDS: The Planetary Data System (PDS) is a public archive. You can look up the original Voyager and Cassini image files. Search for "Saturn ring anomalies" or specific moonlets like "Pan" and "Daphnis."
- Study the "Spokes": Look up the research papers on Saturn’s spokes. It’s one of the most genuinely mysterious features of the rings. Even without aliens, the physics of how dust levitates into these massive, transient structures is wild.
- Read Bergrun with a Grain of Salt: If you find a PDF of The Ringmakers of Saturn, look at the images. Compare them to the modern, raw images from the Cassini Solstice Mission. You’ll see that many of the "blurry cylinders" in Voyager photos are clearly defined as jagged ice rocks in Cassini photos.
- Learn about Plasma Physics: Most of Bergrun’s theories involve how matter behaves in electromagnetic fields. Understanding the difference between a "gravitational orbit" and "electromagnetic suspension" helps you see where he was coming from, even if you don't agree with his conclusions.
Saturn is losing its rings. Recent data suggests they are raining down into the planet and might be gone in 100 million years. Whether they were built by "ring makers" or are just a temporary accident of gravity, they remain the most complex structure in our neighborhood.
✨ Don't miss: Finding Your LG TV Serial Number: Why the Sticker Isn't the Only Way
The story of Norman Bergrun serves as a reminder that even the most high-level experts can look at the same data and see two completely different universes. One sees a graveyard of ice; the other sees a shipyard for the stars. Even if Bergrun was wrong about the "ships," his work pushed people to look closer at the rings than they ever had before. And in science, looking closer is usually how the real discoveries happen anyway.
The next time you see a photo of Saturn, look at the thin, outer F-ring. Look at those braids and kinks. It's probably just the gravity of a tiny moon named Prometheus playing tug-of-war with ice crystals. But for a moment, just imagine if it was something else. That’s the real legacy of the ring makers theory—it keeps us looking up with a sense of "what if."