It looks like a fuzzy orange donut. Honestly, when the first NASA picture of a black hole dropped in 2019, some people were a little underwhelmed. We’ve been raised on a steady diet of sleek, high-definition CGI from movies like Interstellar, where Gargantua looms with crystal-clear accretion disks and terrifyingly sharp edges. Then, real life happened. Scientists showed us a pixelated, glowing ring of gas.
But here’s the thing. That "blurry" image of M87* is arguably one of the greatest technological achievements in human history. It isn't just a photo. It’s a mathematical reconstruction of a monster 55 million light-years away. To get that shot, we basically turned the entire Earth into one giant telescope.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Digital Compact Cassette Documentary is Reopening the 90s Format War
What You’re Actually Seeing in the NASA Picture of a Black Hole
Let’s get the science straight because it’s weird. You can’t actually "see" a black hole. By definition, they are regions where gravity is so intense that even light can’t escape. If you looked at one directly with a normal camera, you’d see... nothing. Just a void.
The glowing orange ring in the NASA picture of a black hole is the accretion disk. This is a swirling graveyard of gas, dust, and stars being ripped apart. This material is moving at relativistic speeds—nearly the speed of light—and friction heats it up to billions of degrees. That heat creates the radio waves that the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) captured.
The dark center? That’s the "shadow." It’s larger than the event horizon itself because of gravitational lensing. Gravity is warping space-time so severely that it bends the path of the light coming from behind the black hole, creating a magnifying effect. It's like looking through the bottom of a wine glass, but the glass is made of gravity.
The "Virtual Telescope" Strategy
How do you take a picture of something so far away? Think about it this way. Taking a photo of M87* from Earth is equivalent to standing in New York and trying to count the dimples on a golf ball in Los Angeles. A single telescope would need to be the size of our entire planet to have enough resolving power.
Since we can't build a telescope 8,000 miles wide, we used Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI). The EHT project linked eight ground-based radio telescopes across the globe—from the high altitudes of the Chilean Andes to the freezing wastes of the South Pole.
By syncing these telescopes with atomic clocks, they recorded data simultaneously. They didn't send this data over the internet. There was too much of it. We’re talking five petabytes of data. They had to physically fly crates of hard drives to central processing centers at the MIT Haystack Observatory and the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy.
Why the Colors Look "Fake"
The orange isn't real. Radio waves are invisible to the human eye. When NASA and the EHT team processed the data, they chose a color palette to represent the intensity of the radio brightness. They chose orange and yellow because it feels hot, which fits the physical reality of a billion-degree plasma cloud. If they had chosen neon purple or lime green, the science would be the same, but the vibe would be... different.
Messier 87 vs. Sagittarius A*
While the M87* photo was the first, the NASA picture of a black hole at the center of our own galaxy—Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*)—followed in 2022. It looks remarkably similar, which actually relieved physicists. It proved that Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity holds up, even at different scales.
- M87* is a titan. It's 6.5 billion times the mass of our sun.
- Sgr A* is a "runt" by comparison, only 4 million solar masses.
Sgr A* was actually much harder to photograph. Because it’s smaller, the gas orbits it much faster. While gas takes weeks to circle M87*, it orbits Sgr A* in minutes. It’s like trying to take a long-exposure photo of a toddler who won’t stop running around the living room. The EHT team had to develop entirely new algorithms to "average out" the movement so the final image wasn't just a smear of light.
[Image comparing the sizes and appearances of M87* and Sagittarius A*]
The People Who Made It Happen
We often talk about NASA, but this was a massive international collaboration. Dr. Katie Bouman famously became the face of the algorithm work, but the team included over 300 researchers. They spent years arguing over the data. They were so worried about "biasing" the results that they split into four separate teams to analyze the data independently. When all four teams came back with the same "donut" shape, they knew they had the real deal.
What Most People Get Wrong About the "Blur"
"Why can't we just zoom in?"
Resolution isn't about the zoom lens; it's about the aperture. To get a sharper image of the NASA picture of a black hole, we need more telescopes or a bigger gap between them.
The next step is actually putting telescopes in space. By placing a radio dish in orbit, we can create a "virtual telescope" larger than Earth. This would sharpen the image from a blurry orange smudge to a crisp ring where we might actually see the "photon ring"—a thin, bright circle of light that has orbited the black hole multiple times.
Why This Matters for Your Life
It’s easy to think this is just "space stuff" that doesn't affect us. But the math used to reconstruct these images is already tricking down into medical imaging. The same types of algorithms that fill in the "gaps" in the EHT data are being used to improve MRI scans and make them faster.
Beyond that, it’s about the big questions. If Einstein was wrong, our entire understanding of GPS, satellite communication, and physics would need a rewrite. So far, the black hole photos suggest he was right on the money.
Your Next Steps for Black Hole Hunting
If you're fascinated by these images, don't just look at the low-res JPEGs on social media.
- Visit the official Event Horizon Telescope website. They have the high-resolution "fits" files and detailed breakdowns of the polarization data (which shows the magnetic fields around the black hole).
- Watch the documentary 'Black Holes: The Edge of All We Know'. It follows the EHT team through the actual stress of the 2017 observing run. It's on several streaming platforms.
- Check out the "Chandra" X-ray Observatory's gallery. NASA often layers X-ray data over the radio images to show the massive jets of energy shooting out from the poles of these black holes—features you can't see in the EHT "donut" photo.
- Use a NASA app. Download the "NASA Visualization Explorer" to see how they map the 3D structure of these objects based on the 2D photos.
Understanding the NASA picture of a black hole requires a bit of a perspective shift. You aren't looking at a "thing." You're looking at the ultimate "no-man's-land"—the point where our laws of physics essentially break down and give up. The blur isn't a failure of the camera; it's a testament to just how far we’re reaching into the dark.
The next few years will likely bring us a "movie" of a black hole. By using the same EHT network, scientists are working on stitching together frames to show the gas actually swirling in real-time. When that drops, the "fuzzy donut" will suddenly feel very alive.