You've probably seen the sleek, dark-mode screenshots or the viral Twitter threads from a couple of years ago. A prompt goes in, and boom—a full presentation comes out. It looked like magic. It felt like the end of the "death by PowerPoint" era. But lately, the conversation around this tool has shifted from hype to a heated tome.is the debate about whether AI can actually handle the heavy lifting of storytelling or if it just creates a digital mess.
Tome (found at tome.is) wasn't just another slide maker. It was the fastest productivity tool to hit a million users. Then, things got weird. By early 2025, the "AI PowerPoint killer" everyone was obsessed with basically vanished in its original form.
Why Everyone Is Arguing About Tome.is Right Now
The core of the tome.is the debate isn't just about a website; it’s about a massive shift in how we work. Some users swear by it for rapid-fire brainstorming. Others? They think it’s the worst thing to happen to communication since the CC-all email.
In 2024 and 2025, the platform underwent what tech insiders call a "strategic pivot." That's corporate-speak for "the original plan didn't make enough money." They shifted hard toward enterprise sales and eventually sold off parts of the brand to AngelList. If you go to the site now, it doesn't feel like the creative playground it used to be. This has left a lot of early adopters feeling abandoned and sparked a huge row over whether "generative storytelling" was ever a viable product or just a very expensive party trick.
The "Automation vs. Augmentation" Problem
Here is the thing. Tome tried to be an "autopilot." You give it a sentence, and it gives you eight slides.
The problem? Most of those slides were... fine. Just fine. The text was often surface-level, kind of like a Wikipedia summary that had been through a blender. For a high-stakes investor pitch or a deep-dive research project, "fine" doesn't cut it.
- The Pro-Tome Side: It kills the "blank page" syndrome. It’s great for getting a structure down in thirty seconds.
- The Anti-Tome Side: It makes everyone lazy. If every deck has that same "Tome aesthetic"—the same dark background, the same DALL-E images, the same vague headings—nothing stands out anymore.
Honestly, this is where the tome.is the debate gets spicy. Critics like the folks over at SlidePeak have argued that Tome failed because it tried to replace human judgment. Meanwhile, competitors like Canva and Gamma took a different route. They kept the human in the driver's seat and just offered AI "co-pilots" to help with the boring stuff like alignment and color palettes.
What Actually Happened to the Platform?
If you're looking for the tool you used in 2023, you might be disappointed. By March 2025, Tome officially moved away from its general-purpose presentation features.
The team and the core tech for sales moved into a new project called Lightfield. The actual "Tome" brand name was snatched up by AngelList to focus on legal and founder-focused AI. It’s a classic Silicon Valley story: a massive $81 million in funding, 20 million users, but a revenue model that couldn't keep up with the massive costs of running generative AI models.
✨ Don't miss: Two External Displays MacBook Air: The Real Reason You’re Probably Confused
It turns out that giving away "magic" for free is really expensive.
The Technical Reality: Why People Switched
One major sticking point in the tome.is the debate was the lack of export options. For a long time, you couldn't even download a PowerPoint file.
Imagine spending hours refining an AI-generated deck only to realize you can't present it offline at a conference. Or you can't send it to a client who insists on a PDF. This "walled garden" approach drove professional users crazy. While Tome was busy making things look "cool" and "web-native," the rest of the world still needed to open files in Outlook.
The Alternatives That Survived
While the debate continues, the market has mostly moved on to tools that play nicer with existing workflows:
- Gamma: This is basically what people wanted Tome to be. It creates docs, decks, and even websites from prompts, but it’s much more flexible.
- Beautiful.ai: This one doesn't try to write your speech. It just makes sure your slides don't look like they were designed by a toddler in 1998.
- Canva Magic Design: The giant in the room. It’s got the templates, the assets, and the brand consistency that Tome lacked.
Actionable Insights: How to Navigate the AI Presentation Space
If you are stuck in the middle of the tome.is the debate and just want to know what to use for your next meeting, here is the reality check.
First, stop looking for a "one-click" solution. It doesn't exist. Any AI that claims to do 100% of the work will give you a 40% result. Use AI to generate an outline or to find a specific image, but you have to write the "soul" of the presentation yourself.
👉 See also: Finding an NBC Live Free Map: Why Local News Access is Getting Weird
Second, check your export needs before you commit to a platform. If you need a .pptx file, don't use a tool that only gives you a shareable link.
Third, focus on "Vertical AI." The lesson from Tome’s pivot is that general tools are struggling. Look for tools specifically designed for your niche—whether that’s sales prospecting, academic research, or creative portfolios.
The tome.is the debate taught us that while AI can generate a "tome" of information, it can't yet generate a meaningful connection with an audience. That part is still on you.
Next Steps for Better Presentations:
- Audit Your Workflow: Identify if you're wasting time on design (alignment, fonts) or content (writing, data). Pick a tool that solves only your specific bottleneck.
- Test "Co-pilot" Tools: Move away from "prompt-to-deck" generators and try "edit-with-AI" features in Google Slides or Canva to keep control over your narrative.
- Prioritize Exportability: Always ensure your chosen platform allows for offline PDF or PPTX backups to avoid being locked into a single ecosystem.