The universe is mostly empty. That’s the first thing you realize when you spend too much time staring at images of galaxies hubble space telescope has captured over the last three decades. It’s a lot of nothing, interrupted by these impossible, swirling islands of light.
Honestly, it’s kind of a miracle we have them at all. Back in 1990, when Hubble first launched, it was basically a billion-dollar paperweight because the primary mirror had a flaw thinner than a human hair. People thought it was a total disaster. But then, NASA sent up a "glasses" prescription for the telescope, and suddenly, the blurry blobs became crystal-clear spirals.
👉 See also: The Sea-Based X-Band Radar: Why This Massive Golf Ball Is Still Floating
The Secret Sauce Behind Hubble's Galaxy Shots
You might think these photos are exactly what you’d see if you were floating in a spacesuit next to the telescope. They aren’t. Hubble doesn’t really "take photos" in the way your iPhone does. It uses electronic detectors that record light as digital data.
The cameras on Hubble—specifically the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) and the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS)—record images in grayscale. Scientists then assign colors to different filters. Usually, red represents longer wavelengths, like sulfur or hydrogen-alpha, while blue might represent shorter wavelengths. It’s a bit like "painting by numbers" but for the cosmos.
Why do they do this? To reveal the physics. If you see a bright pinkish-red glow in an image of the Andromeda galaxy, you’re looking at massive clouds of hydrogen gas where new stars are being born. The blue regions? Those are usually hot, young, massive stars that burn fast and die young.
Why Resolution Matters More Than Megapixels
We live in a world where every smartphone has a 48-megapixel camera. Hubble’s primary camera is only about 16 megapixels. That sounds low, right? But here’s the thing: Hubble is outside the atmosphere.
Earth’s atmosphere is basically a thick, shimmering soup. It’s what makes stars twinkle, which is poetic for poets but a nightmare for astronomers. By sitting 340 miles up, Hubble avoids all that "seeing" interference. It can resolve details that ground-based telescopes would just see as a smear.
The Iconic "Pillars of Creation" and Beyond
You’ve seen the Pillars of Creation. It’s arguably the most famous image in human history. It’s technically part of the Eagle Nebula, and while it's not a galaxy itself, it’s the building block of them.
But look closer at the images of galaxies hubble space telescope has provided, like the Sombrero Galaxy (M104). It looks like a glowing hat with a dark rim. That rim is actually a massive ring of dust. We only know this because Hubble’s resolution is sharp enough to distinguish the silhouettes of dust clouds against the glow of billions of stars.
Then there’s the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. This is the one that really messes with your head. Astronomers pointed the telescope at a tiny, "empty" patch of sky—about the size of a grain of sand held at arm's length—and let it stare for 11 days.
The result? Nearly 10,000 galaxies. Each one contains hundreds of billions of stars.
It turns out "empty" space isn't empty. It’s crowded.
Hubble vs. Webb: The Sibling Rivalry
Since the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) launched, some people think Hubble is obsolete. That’s just not true. They’re different tools.
Hubble primarily sees "visible" light—the kind we see—and ultraviolet. Webb sees "infrared." Because of this, Hubble is actually better at seeing the hot, energetic processes of star formation, while Webb "looks through" the dust to see the structures hidden inside.
Think of it like this: Hubble gives you the beautiful, cinematic view of a city at night. Webb gives you the thermal scan that shows where the heaters are running inside the buildings. We need both.
The Hubble Constant Tension
There’s a real controversy in science called the "Hubble Tension." Basically, by looking at images of galaxies hubble space telescope has tracked, astronomers try to measure how fast the universe is expanding.
Hubble’s data gives us one number. The cosmic microwave background (the afterglow of the Big Bang) gives us another. They don’t match. This isn’t a mistake; it’s a crisis in physics. It means there’s something about dark energy or the way gravity works that we just don't understand yet. Hubble is literally poking holes in our current understanding of reality.
Understanding the "Grand Design" Spirals
Not all galaxies are created equal. You have your "Grand Design" spirals, like M100. These have those perfect, sweeping arms that look like a hurricane made of stars.
- Ellipticals: These look like glowing lemons or fuzzy footballs. They’re old. They’ve finished making stars and are basically "zombie" galaxies.
- Irregulars: These look like someone dropped a bucket of glitter. The Large Magellanic Cloud is a great example.
- Lenticulars: These are the middle ground—they have a disk but no spiral arms.
Hubble showed us that galaxies are constantly colliding. When two galaxies merge, they don't usually crash star-into-star because there’s so much empty space. Instead, they pass through each other, their gravity pulling and stretching them into weird shapes, like the "Antennae Galaxies."
How to Find and Use These Images Yourself
One of the coolest things about NASA is that they are a government agency. That means you own these photos. Your tax dollars paid for them.
You can go to the HubbleSite or the ESA Hubble archives and download the full-resolution TIF files. Be warned: they are huge. Some are several gigabytes. But if you zoom in, you can see individual star clusters in a galaxy millions of light-years away. It’s a trip.
Actionable Steps for Exploring the Cosmos
If you want to do more than just scroll through Instagram for your space fix, here’s how to actually engage with this data:
- Download the Hubble Heritage Files: Instead of the compressed JPEGs you see on news sites, look for the "Fullsize Original" TIFs. Use them as desktop backgrounds or print them for wall art. The level of detail in the raw files is significantly higher.
- Use WorldWide Telescope: This is a free tool that lets you navigate the sky using data from Hubble and other observatories. It’s like Google Earth but for the entire universe.
- Check the "Picture of the Week": The ESA Hubble site still puts out a new image almost every week. Many of these are of obscure "interacting" galaxies that look like cosmic tug-of-wars.
- Join a Citizen Science Project: Check out Zooniverse’s "Galaxy Zoo." You can actually help astronomers classify galaxy shapes from telescope data. Real people have discovered new types of astronomical objects just by clicking through these images.
- Look for the "Frontier Fields": If you want to see the limits of what Hubble can do, search for the Frontier Fields images. These use "gravitational lensing"—where a massive cluster of galaxies acts like a giant magnifying glass—to see even further back in time than the telescope could on its own.
Hubble is aging, and its gyroscopes are starting to fail, but it’s still the most productive scientific instrument ever built. Every image it sends back is a time capsule, showing us the universe not as it is now, but as it was millions or billions of years ago. It’s the closest thing we have to a time machine.