You’ve probably heard the phrase whispered in tech circles or seen it buried in the terms of service of a new AI app. It sounds like a philosophical platitude. It isn’t. When we talk about the concept of no matter what you are in the context of modern data processing and digital presence, we are actually talking about the fundamental way algorithms strip away human nuance to categorize us into profitable buckets. It’s about the "what" versus the "who."
Think about the last time you browsed for a pair of running shoes and suddenly your entire digital existence—from Instagram ads to the sidebar of a news site—was convinced you were a marathon runner. The system didn’t care about your personality, your day job, or your existential dread. To the algorithm, no matter what you are as a human being, you were simply a "High-Intent Fitness Consumer."
This transition from being a person to being a data point is the core of our current technological era. It’s messy. It’s slightly terrifying. Honestly, it’s mostly just misunderstood.
The Logic of Universal Categorization
The tech industry loves a good abstraction. At the architectural level, software developers often build systems to be "type-agnostic." This is a fancy way of saying the code should work the same regardless of the input. Whether you are a small business owner in Ohio or a teenager in Seoul, the underlying logic of a social media engagement loop is identical.
💡 You might also like: Live VIPIR 6 Radar Explained (Simply)
They don't see your soul. They see a string of integers.
In 2024, the Journal of Cybersecurity published a study exploring how metadata profiling creates these rigid identities. The researchers found that once an AI assigns you a "persona," it becomes incredibly difficult to break out of that loop. This is the technical reality of no matter what you are—your digital shadow becomes more real to the bank or the advertiser than your physical self.
It’s efficient for them. It’s suffocating for you.
We often think we have control over our online presence. We post photos of our brunch. We tweet our hot takes. But the machine is looking for patterns that transcend those specifics. It’s looking for the "what." If you spend $5 on a coffee every morning, the bank’s fraud detection algorithm treats you as a specific risk profile. If you suddenly buy a $5,000 diamond ring, you trigger a flag. No matter what you are—a wealthy collector or a desperate person making a one-time mistake—the system treats the anomaly the same way.
Why the "What" Trumps the "Who" in AI
Machine learning models, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), operate on a similar principle. When you interact with an AI, it uses a process called "embedding." It turns your words into a series of coordinates in a multi-dimensional space.
✨ Don't miss: When Are Aliens Coming: What Science Actually Says About the Timeline
It’s math. Just math.
Expert AI researchers like Timnit Gebru have long argued that this mathematical reductionism leads to bias. If the training data says that "Software Engineer" equals "Male," then no matter what you are in reality, the AI will lean toward that bias when generating content or screening resumes. The "what" (the data pattern) overrides the "who" (the actual person applying for the job).
This isn't just a glitch in the system; it's the system's design. To process billions of people, you have to ignore their individuality. You have to categorize.
The Identity Crisis of the 2020s
We are currently living through a period where people are fighting back against this categorization. You see it in the "Right to be Forgotten" movements in Europe. You see it in the rise of decentralized social media like Mastodon or Bluesky, where people hope to escape the monolithic "what" of Meta’s algorithms.
But it’s a steep climb.
Consider the "Echo Chamber" effect. If an algorithm decides you are a "Political Partisan," it will feed you content that reinforces that view. Soon, your entire digital reality is shaped by that single label. It’s a feedback loop where the system decides no matter what you are today, you must stay that way tomorrow to keep their engagement metrics high.
The Commercial Reality of Being a Data Point
Let’s talk money. Why does this happen? Because "Who" doesn't scale, but "What" does.
Acxiom, one of the world’s largest data brokers, reportedly has data on 2.5 billion people worldwide. They don't know you. They know your "what." They categorize people into groups like "Shooting Star" (young, high-income, urban) or "Hard Scrabble" (low-income, rural).
- Your credit score is a "what."
- Your "Engagement Score" on TikTok is a "what."
- Your "Risk Rating" at an insurance company is a "what."
If you apply for a mortgage, the underwriter looks at your debt-to-income ratio. No matter what you are—a hard-working teacher or a trust fund kid—the ratio is the primary gatekeeper. We like to think there is a human on the other side of the desk who understands our story. Often, there isn't. There’s just a screen with a green or red light.
Practical Steps to Reclaim the "Who"
So, how do you live in a world that insists on treating you as a category? You can’t fully opt-out unless you move to a cabin in the woods and throw your iPhone in a lake. Most of us can't do that.
The first step is digital hygiene. Using privacy-focused tools isn't just about hiding; it's about confusing the categorizers. If you use a VPN, if you clear your cookies, if you use multiple browsers for different tasks, you make it harder for the "no matter what you are" logic to stick. You become a moving target.
Secondly, understand the limitations of the systems you use. When you see a recommendation that feels "so you," recognize it as a mirror of your past behavior, not a map of your future potential. Don't let the "what" dictate your choices.
Next Steps for Protecting Your Identity:
- Audit your digital footprint. Use tools like "Have I Been Pwned" to see where your data has leaked and "Say Mine" to see which companies are holding your personal "what" data.
- Diversify your inputs. Intentionally search for topics outside your usual interests. Read news from sources you disagree with. It messes with the algorithm’s ability to put you in a neat box.
- Use privacy-first browsers. Brave or Firefox with strict tracking protection prevents sites from building a cohesive profile of you as you move across the web.
- Be skeptical of "Personalized" services. Often, personalization is just a polite word for "we’ve categorized you and won’t let you see anything else."
The digital world will always try to simplify you. It’s cheaper that way. It’s more profitable. But your actual identity is a chaotic, changing, beautiful mess that no algorithm can truly capture. Understanding that no matter what you are to a machine is just a fraction of who you are to the world is the first step in taking back control.