Physics feels heavy. Most people think of it as a series of cold, chalkboard equations that have nothing to do with the "real world" of emotion or art. Then you meet Stephon Alexander. He’s a theoretical physicist at Brown University, but he’s also a professional saxophonist. His book, The Jazz of Physics, basically argues that the universe isn't just a machine; it's an improvisational session.
It’s a wild idea.
🔗 Read more: Wireless Keyboard with Case: Why Your Tablet Still Feels Like a Toy
Honestly, the first time you hear someone say the Big Bang was like a Coltrane solo, you might roll your eyes. But Alexander isn't just making a metaphor. He’s looking at the actual mathematical structures of the cosmos and finding they mirror the structures of jazz music. The book isn't just a memoir of a Black scientist finding his way in a white-dominated field, though it is that. It’s a deep dive into how "vibrations" and "cycles" are the literal building blocks of everything we touch.
The Weird Connection Between Coltrane and Einstein
If you’ve ever looked at John Coltrane’s "Giant Steps," you know it’s a nightmare for musicians. It’s fast. It’s complex. It follows a specific geometric pattern known as the Coltrane Circle. Alexander stumbled upon a sketch Coltrane gave to musician Yusef Lateef in 1967, and as a physicist, he saw something else entirely. He saw the same symmetries that appear in quantum physics.
Coltrane was obsessed with Einstein. He wanted to do with music what Einstein did with physics—find a unified theory.
The core of Stephon Alexander and The Jazz of Physics is this concept of "resonance." In jazz, resonance is what makes a room feel alive when a certain note hits. In physics, resonance is why atoms stay together. If you look at the early universe, it was basically a hot, dense soup of plasma. Sound waves—actual acoustic oscillations—rippled through that soup. These "sound waves" helped determine where galaxies would eventually form.
Basically, the structure of the entire universe is an echo of ancient music.
Improvisation as a Scientific Method
We’re taught that science is rigid. You follow the scientific method: hypothesis, experiment, conclusion. Step by step. Very boring.
Alexander argues that the best science happens when you improvise.
Think about it. When a jazz musician is on stage, they aren't thinking about scales. They’ve practiced scales for 10,000 hours so that their subconscious can take over. Theoretical physics works the same way. You spend years learning the math, but the "aha!" moment—that breakthrough regarding dark matter or string theory—usually comes when you stop trying so hard and let your mind wander.
💡 You might also like: Can You Actually Use an Invisible Filter TikTok Remover? The Truth About That Viral Trend
It’s "intuition through play."
He talks about his time at Imperial College London and how his mentor, Chris Isham, encouraged this kind of thinking. It wasn't about being "right" immediately. It was about finding the rhythm of the problem. If the math felt "clunky" or "out of tune," it probably wasn't the right answer. There is an inherent aesthetic to the laws of nature.
Why the Early Universe Sounded Like a Saxophone
This sounds like a stretch, but it's grounded in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).
- The CMB is the "afterglow" of the Big Bang.
- It contains fluctuations in temperature.
- Physicists like Alexander analyze these fluctuations using Fourier transforms—the same math used to analyze sound waves in a recording studio.
When Alexander looks at the data from the Planck satellite, he isn't just seeing dots on a map. He’s seeing the "overtones" of the universe. Just as a saxophone produces a fundamental note and several overtones that give it a unique "timbre," the universe has a timbre.
If the universe had different physical constants, the "song" would be different. It might be noise. But instead, it’s organized. It’s a composition.
The Problem with Modern Physics Education
One of the most important takeaways from The Jazz of Physics is how we exclude people from science by making it feel inaccessible.
Alexander grew up in the Bronx. He didn't always see himself as a physicist because the "image" of a scientist didn't look like him. But he saw the same genius in the DJs and jazz musicians in his neighborhood that he saw in the textbooks. By bridging these two worlds, he’s making a case for a more inclusive, "funky" version of science.
He’s basically saying: "Hey, if you understand how a beat drops, you can understand how an electron moves."
📖 Related: How to cut copy and paste on iPad: Why Your Fingers Are Doing It Wrong
It’s not about dumbing things down. It’s about changing the language. When we use music as a bridge, the math becomes less scary. It becomes a tool for expression rather than a barrier to entry. This is probably why the book became such a hit in the "Discover" feed and beyond—it speaks to the human element of discovery.
Complexity vs. Simplicity
The universe is incredibly complex, but the laws are simple.
Jazz is the same. A standard 12-bar blues is a simple structure. But within that structure, you can have infinite complexity. This is the "interplay" Alexander loves. He talks about how the vacuum of space isn't actually empty. It’s a "superfluid." It’s bubbling with virtual particles popping in and out of existence.
It’s a constant, chaotic jam session.
If you try to control every particle, the physics breaks down. You have to look at the collective behavior. This shift from "reductionism" (looking at small parts) to "holism" (looking at the whole song) is where modern physics is heading. Whether we are talking about quantum gravity or the expansion of the universe, we’re looking for the melody that ties it all together.
Actionable Insights for the Curious Mind
You don't need a PhD to apply the principles of The Jazz of Physics to your own life or work. The book is a blueprint for "interdisciplinary thinking," which is basically a fancy way of saying "don't stay in your lane."
- Embrace the "Wrong" Notes: In jazz, there are no wrong notes, only notes that are resolved poorly. In your own projects, don't fear errors. Treat them as data points that lead to a better "melody."
- Find Your Analogies: If you’re struggling to understand a complex concept—whether it’s blockchain, AI, or taxes—find a hobby you love and map the concept onto it. If you love cooking, explain the problem through recipes. If you love sports, use game strategy.
- Practice Productive Procrastination: Alexander found his breakthroughs while playing his sax, not while staring at a calculator. Give your brain permission to play.
- Listen to the "Giant Steps" Album: Seriously. Listen to John Coltrane while reading about the expansion of the universe. You’ll start to "feel" the mathematical repetitions and the leaps of logic.
- Look for Symmetries: Whether you’re designing an app or writing a report, look for repeating patterns. Nature loves symmetry, and usually, the most "elegant" solution is the one that follows a natural rhythm.
The universe isn't a silent, dark void. It’s a vibrating, humming, improvising masterpiece. Stephon Alexander didn't just write a book about physics; he wrote a love letter to the way everything is connected. If you can hear the music in the stars, the world starts to look a lot less like a math problem and a lot more like a concert.