Forget the neon lasers from the movies. If you’re waiting for a massive explosion over the Pacific to signal the start of the war in space, you’re looking at the wrong map. It’s already started. Honestly, it’s been happening for years, just not in a way that creates a cinematic fireball. It’s quieter. More "glitchy." It looks like a GPS signal dropping out in the middle of a desert or a satellite suddenly spinning out of control because someone "blinded" its sensors with a ground-based laser.
Space is no longer the "Global Commons" we pretended it was during the Apollo era. It’s a combat domain. The Pentagon knows it. The Kremlin knows it. Beijing is counting on it. We've moved from the era of exploration to the era of "Counterspace Operations," and the stakes are basically everything that makes modern life functional.
🔗 Read more: Remove objects from video: Why it’s still harder than it looks (and how to actually do it)
The Invisible Frontline
When people talk about the war in space, they usually think about Kinetic Kill Vehicles (KKVs). These are essentially "smart rocks" launched at thousands of miles per hour to smash into a satellite. Russia tested one in November 2021, destroying their own defunct Cosmos 1408 satellite. It created a cloud of 1,500 pieces of trackable debris. That’s the messy, loud version of space warfare. It’s effective, sure, but it’s also kind of a self-defeatist move because that debris field doesn't care whose satellite it hits next.
But the real fight? It’s electronic.
Electronic warfare (EW) is the preferred weapon of the modern era because it’s reversible and deniable. If you jam a Starlink terminal in Ukraine—which Russia has tried repeatedly—you haven't "destroyed" the satellite. You’ve just made it a very expensive piece of floating junk for a few hours. There’s no debris. There’s no "act of war" smoking gun that leads to a nuclear exchange. It’s just... noise. General B. Chance Saltzman, the Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force, has been pretty vocal about this. He calls it "contested, congested, and competitive."
The "Bodyguard" Satellites
We’re seeing a rise in what experts call RPO—Rendezvous and Proximity Operations. This is where one satellite gets uncomfortably close to another. In 2020, a Russian "inspector" satellite, Cosmos 2542, started tailing a U.S. spy satellite (USA 245). It was basically stalking it in orbit.
Imagine a high-stakes game of "I'm not touching you" played at 17,500 miles per hour.
This isn't just about spying. If you can get close enough to a satellite, you can spray paint its lenses. You can snap off an antenna with a robotic arm. You can even "nudge" it out of its intended orbit until it runs out of fuel trying to correct itself. This is the "grey zone" of the war in space. It’s aggressive, but it’s not an explosion, so the legal definitions of conflict get really blurry.
Why the "High Ground" Matters for Your Morning Coffee
You probably don’t think about the 24 GPS satellites run by the U.S. Space Force when you’re ordering an Uber or checking the weather. You should. GPS isn't just for maps. It’s the world’s clock. The timing signals from these satellites synchronize banking transactions, power grids, and cellular networks.
If those signals go dark? The global economy doesn't just slow down; it breaks.
- Financial Markets: High-frequency trading relies on microsecond-accurate timestamps from space.
- Logistics: Ships and planes can’t navigate efficiently without precise positioning.
- Agriculture: Modern "precision farming" uses GPS to steer tractors and manage yields.
China’s military doctrine, specifically what they call "Informatized Warfare," treats space as the "nervous system" of the enemy. If you cut the nerves, the muscles (the tanks, the jets, the carriers) can’t move. They become blind and deaf. This is why the war in space is the precursor to any terrestrial conflict. If a war breaks out over Taiwan, the first shots won't be fired on the ground. They’ll be fired 22,000 miles up in Geostationary Orbit (GEO).
The Debris Problem: The Kessler Syndrome
We have to talk about Donald Kessler. He was a NASA scientist who, back in 1978, proposed a terrifying scenario. If there’s too much junk in orbit, one collision creates more debris, which causes more collisions, until the entire low-Earth orbit (LEO) is a swirling shell of shrapnel.
Basically, we lock ourselves out of space for centuries.
✨ Don't miss: Shark MessMaster: What Nobody Tells You About This Cordless Spot Cleaner
Every time a country tests an Anti-Satellite (ASAT) weapon, like India did in 2019 or Russia in 2021, we get closer to this tipping point. The international community is currently scrambling to create "norms of behavior" to prevent this. The U.S. has pledged not to conduct destructive, direct-ascent ASAT tests and is trying to get others to sign on. But when the choice is "lose the war" or "ruin orbit for everyone," most military planners are going to choose the latter. It’s a classic Tragedy of the Commons.
The New Players: SpaceX and the Commercial Factor
In the past, the war in space was a game for two or three superpowers. Not anymore. Companies like SpaceX, Maxar, and Planet are now primary targets. During the early days of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Viasat’s KA-SAT network was hit by a massive cyberattack. It didn't just affect Ukraine; it knocked out remote monitoring for thousands of wind turbines in Germany.
The line between "civilian" and "military" infrastructure has evaporated.
If a private company’s satellite is used to provide targeting data to an army, does that make the satellite a legitimate military target? According to the Law of Armed Conflict, maybe. But if Russia shoots down a SpaceX satellite, does Elon Musk go to war? Does the U.S. government respond as if it were a military asset? We don't have clear answers yet. We're making up the rules as we go, which is a dangerous way to handle weapons that travel faster than a bullet.
Designing for Resilience: The Space Force Pivot
For decades, the U.S. built "Big, Fat, Juicy Targets." These were massive satellites, the size of a school bus, costing billions of dollars. They were technological marvels, but they were incredibly vulnerable. If you lose one, you lose a massive chunk of your capability.
Now, the strategy has shifted to "Proliferated Low Earth Orbit" (pLEO). Instead of one giant satellite, you launch a "constellation" of a thousand small ones. If an enemy shoots down ten, or even fifty, the network survives. It’s the "Internet" model applied to orbital hardware. You can't kill a swarm easily. This is what the Space Development Agency (SDA) is currently building. It’s a shift from protection to resilience.
What You Can Actually Do
You can’t stop a laser from blinding a satellite, but you can understand the vulnerability of the systems you rely on. The war in space isn't just a government problem.
- Demand Data Sovereignty: Recognize that "the cloud" is often just "a satellite." If your business relies on 100% uptime, ask about the terrestrial backups for your satellite-linked services.
- Support Orbital Sustainability: Keep an eye on the "Zero Debris Charter" and companies like Astroscale or ClearSpace. These are the "janitors of space" trying to de-orbit junk before it becomes a weapon.
- Harden Your Cyber Defenses: Most "space wars" start on a keyboard. Satellite ground stations are often the weakest link. If you work in tech or infrastructure, space security starts with your local firewall.
- Stay Informed on Policy: The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 is woefully outdated. It bans nukes in space, but it doesn't say anything about "dual-use" robots or high-powered lasers. Watch the UN's Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on reducing space threats.
The reality is that space is no longer a vacuum. It’s a crowded, messy neighborhood where everyone is watching everyone else. The "war" isn't coming—it's the background noise of the 21st century.
Actionable Next Steps
To protect yourself and your organization from the fallout of space-based disruptions, start by auditing your "Space Dependency." Identify every service you use that relies on GPS or satellite internet. If those signals were jammed tomorrow, do you have a 48-hour contingency plan? Next, follow the work of the Secure World Foundation or CSIS Space Security Project to get non-biased, technical breakdowns of orbital threats. Finally, advocate for international norms that treat orbital debris as a global environmental crisis, because once the Kessler Syndrome starts, there's no "undo" button.