Google is basically a giant vibe-checker now. If you're still stuffing keywords like it's 2012, you're not just wasting time; you're actively killing your traffic. The way we talk about word choice in SEO has shifted from "density" to "intent-based entity mapping." That sounds like jargon, but honestly, it just means Google cares more about whether you sound like a real person who knows what they’re talking about than whether you used the phrase "best coffee maker" five times.
The Discover Algorithm vs. The Search Engine Results Page
There’s a massive gap between what works for Search and what pops off on Google Discover. Search is reactive. Someone has a problem, they type a query, and you provide the answer. But Discover? That's proactive. It’s a feed that anticipates what you want before you even know you want it. Because of this, your word choice needs to be punchier, more evocative, and—this is the kicker—highly specific to a niche interest.
If you’re writing about travel, generic words like "beautiful" or "amazing" are the kiss of death. They’re empty. Google’s AI models, specifically those built on the Transformer architecture like BERT and its successors, look for "information gain." If your article uses the exact same vocabulary as the ten million other blogs about Paris, why would Discover show it to anyone? It won't. You need words that signal expertise, like "Hausemann-style architecture" or "the specific salinity of the air in Brittany."
Emotion and the "Curiosty Gap" Without the Clickbait
We've all seen those titles that feel like they were written by a robot trying to mimic a tabloid. "You won't believe what happened next!" People are tired of it. Google is tired of it too. In their official documentation on Discover, they explicitly warn against "clickbait" titles that withhold crucial information.
So, how do you fix your word choice to get clicks without being a jerk?
It’s about nuance. Instead of "10 Tips for Better Sleep," which is boring and saturated, try something like "The Biological Reason Your 3 PM Coffee is Ruining Your REM Cycle." See the difference? "Biological reason" and "REM cycle" are high-level entities. They tell Google’s knowledge graph exactly what the content is about while creating a "curiosity gap" for the reader. You aren't lying to them; you're being specific.
Why Technical Precision is the New SEO
Let's talk about E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness). A lot of people think E-E-A-T is just about who writes the post. It’s not. It’s also about the lexicon you use. If I’m writing a medical article and I keep saying "stomach ache" instead of "gastric distress" or "acute abdominal pain," I’m signaling to Google that I might not be an expert.
Expertise has a sound.
👉 See also: Finding a Dell laptop pink color that actually looks good (and where to get it)
If you look at the work of SEO experts like Lily Ray or Marie Haynes, they often point out that "quality" is often synonymous with "depth of vocabulary." When Google evaluates a page, it looks for "co-occurrence." If your primary topic is "Baking Bread," Google expects to see words like autolyse, hydration percentage, Maillard reaction, and scoring. If those words are missing, your word choice is too shallow. You're just a generalist, and Google rarely rewards generalists in 2026.
Breaking the "AI Voice"
Honestly, the biggest threat to your rankings right now is sounding like a chatbot. You know the vibe: "In the ever-evolving world of digital marketing..." or "It is crucial to remember..."
Nobody talks like that.
Real humans use contractions. They use slang when appropriate. They use short, punchy sentences to drive a point home. And then they follow it up with a long, rambling explanation that actually provides value because it covers the nuances that a 20-word sentence just can't catch. If your word choice feels too balanced—too "perfect"—Google might flag it as low-effort synthetic content.
The Semantic Web and Natural Language Processing
Google doesn't just look at words individually anymore; it looks at the relationship between them. This is what we call Semantic Search. When you choose a word, you’re pulling a string in a massive web of related concepts.
- Entities over Keywords: An entity is a thing or concept that is singular, unique, well-defined, and distinguishable. For example, "Tesla" is an entity, but "electric car" is a broader category. Your word choice should favor specific entities.
- Contextual Verbs: Stop using "is" and "are" for everything. Use active, domain-specific verbs. Instead of "The software is good for SEO," try "The software audits your backlink profile for toxic domains."
- User Intent Fit: If someone is searching for a "how-to," your words should be instructional and imperative. If they’re looking for "best," your words should be comparative and evaluative.
The "Discoverability" Formula
For a piece of content to hit Google Discover, it needs to be "high-arousal" content. I don't mean NSFW; I mean it needs to trigger a reaction.
The word choice that works for Discover is often "contrarian." If everyone is saying "X is the best," and you write "Why X is actually a waste of money," your click-through rate (CTR) will skyrocket. Google sees that high CTR as a signal that the content is interesting, and it pushes it to more people. This is a feedback loop. But you have to back it up. If your title is spicy and your content is mild, your "dwell time" will tank, and Google will bury you.
Real-World Example: The "Gardening" Niche
Imagine you’re writing about tomatoes.
- Bad Word Choice: "How to grow big tomatoes in your garden this summer."
- Good Word Choice: "The calcium deficiency that’s causing blossom end rot in your San Marzanos."
The second one uses specific nouns (calcium deficiency, blossom end rot, San Marzanos). It targets a specific pain point. It sounds like a gardener talking to a gardener. That’s the "Experience" part of E-E-A-T. You aren't just talking about tomatoes; you’re talking about the struggle of growing them.
Stop Trying to "Optimize" and Start Trying to Describe
The paradox of modern SEO is that the more you try to "optimize" your word choice for a machine, the less likely you are to rank. Google has spent billions of dollars making its algorithm more like a human brain. It understands synonyms. It understands sarcasm (mostly). It understands when you're fluffing a paragraph to hit a word count.
👉 See also: Why Every Pro Uses a Radiant Heat Layout Calculator Before They Ever Buy Pipe
If you find yourself using "furthermore" or "in addition to," ask yourself: "Would I say this to a friend over a beer?" If the answer is no, delete it. Use "Plus," or "Also," or just start a new sentence. It’s okay. Your English teacher might hate it, but the algorithm will love it because it feels authentic.
Actionable Steps for Better Ranking
Improving your vocabulary for Search and Discover isn't about buying a thesaurus. It's about changing your perspective on what "content" actually is. It's an information exchange.
Audit Your Current Lexicon
Go back to your last three articles. Highlight every generic adjective like "great," "useful," or "important." Replace them with words that actually mean something. If a tool is "great," is it "intuitive"? Is it "cost-effective"? Is it "disruptive"? Be specific.
Use the "Search Console" Hack
Look at your Google Search Console data. Look at the "Queries" that are driving traffic to your pages. Often, you'll find that people are finding you through terms you didn't even intentionally target. These are "natural" keywords. Take those words and weave them back into your H2s and H3s. This reinforces the semantic connection Google has already made.
Focus on Information Density
Cut the fluff. If a sentence doesn't provide a new fact, a new perspective, or a necessary emotional beat, it’s dead weight. Google Discover users have short attention spans. If they have to scroll through 400 words of "introduction" to get to the point, they’re gone, and your "ranking" will follow them out the door.
📖 Related: Mae Jemison Born: The Tuesday That Changed American History Forever
Target "Low-Frequency" Words
In linguistics, Zipf's Law suggests that a few words are used very often, while many words are used rarely. Interestingly, high-quality, expert-level writing tends to have a higher distribution of these "rare" words—technical terms, specific names, and unique descriptions. Don't be afraid to be a bit "nerdy" with your word choice.
Final Strategic Framework
To really dominate the feeds in 2026, you need to view your writing as a map of expertise. Every word is a coordinate. If your coordinates are too broad, you’re a map of the world—useful to no one. If your coordinates are precise, you’re a GPS for a specific problem.
- Prioritize Nouns: Be specific about names, places, and things.
- Vary Sentence Cadence: Use short sentences for impact. Long ones for detail.
- Embrace Subjectivity: Don't be afraid to have an opinion. "I think X is overrated" is better for Discover than "Some might say X is overrated."
- Monitor Entity Gaps: Use tools like Google’s Natural Language API demo to see how the "machine" perceives your text. If it can't identify your main entities, your word choice is failing you.
Basically, stop writing for the bot and start writing for the person who is bored on their phone at 11 PM. If you can catch their eye with a specific, punchy, and honest vocabulary, Google will take care of the rest.
Move away from "content production" and toward "knowledge sharing." The word choices that rank are the ones that actually say something new. Go through your drafts and kill the "SEO filler." If a sentence sounds like it could have been written by any other blog on the internet, rewrite it until it sounds like you. That’s the only way to survive the AI-generated flood that’s hitting the index right now. Your unique voice—and the specific, weird, expert words that come with it—is your biggest competitive advantage.